A Rare Cause of Enteritis in an Adult Male

Introduction: IgA vasculitis is more commonly seen in the pediatric population than in adults. Rarely IgA vasculitis is associated with malignancy, most commonly solid tumor malignancies, although there are case reports of association with hematologic malignancies. We report a case of large B-cell lymphoma mimicking IgA vasculitis in a 33-year-old immunosuppressed male with a prior history of IgA vasculitis. Case Description/Methods: A 33-year-old Caucasian male post renal transplant from reflux nephropathy on chronic immunosuppression was hospitalized for postprandial epigastric abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Two years prior, he was admitted for the same symptoms, palpable purpura of the lower extremities and elevated serum IgA. Enteroscopy had shown duodenal and jejunal ulceration with biopsies staining positive for IgA, confirming IgA vasculitis. He had complete resolution with a steroid taper. His current presentation had resulted in multiple hospital admissions, but empiric trial of steroids failed to alleviate symptoms. Vitals were normal and exam was notable for epigastric tenderness. Labs were notable for WBC 19.00 x103/cmm with normal differential, hemoglobin 9.2 gm/dL (prior 11.0 gm/dL), CRP 20.7 mg/L, serum creatinine 2.7 mg/dL (prior 1.5 mg/dL), and urinalysis with proteinuria, sterile pyuria, and hematuria. CTA abdomen/pelvis revealed thickening of the duodenum with shotty mesenteric lymph nodes without ischemia. Enteroscopy revealed an erythematous duodenum and jejunum (figure A). Jejunal biopsy (figure B) revealed CD20 positive cells consistent with DLCBL (figure C). He was seen by oncology and treated with R-CHOP but later unfortunately expired due to COVID-19 complications. Discussion(s): Non small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma are most commonly associated with IgA vasculitis. It may also be seen in both Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphomas in adult patients. If IgA vasculitis occurs after a malignancy is diagnosed, it may indicate that metastasis has occurred. Malignancy associated IgA vasculitis is more likely to have an incomplete response to steroids and requires treatment of the underlying malignancy to achieve remission. Our case illustrates posterior probability error and premature closure cognitive biases. We should consider alternative diagnoses rather than anchor on prior diagnoses even when presentations are similar. Our case also highlights the importance of considering occult malignancy in adults with diagnosis of IgA vasculitis.

Medicinal bismuth: Bismuth-organic frameworks as pharmaceutically privileged compounds

Historically organometallic compounds have been used to cure certain diseases with limited applications. Although bismuth belongs to the category of heavy metals, many of its derivatives have found applications in modern drug discovery research, mainly because of its low toxicity and higher bioavailability. Being an eco-friendly mild Lewis acid, compounds having bismuth as a central atom are capable of binding several proteins in humans and other species. Bismuth complexes demonstrated antibacterial potential in syphilis, diarrhea, gastritis, and colitis. Apart from antibacterial activities, bismuth compounds exhibited anticancer, antileishmanial, and some extent of antifungal and other medicinal properties. This article discusses major synthetic methods and pharmacological potentials of bismuth complexes exhibiting in vitro activity to significant clinical performance in a systematic and timely manner.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

TULAREMIA PRESENTING AS LARGE GI ULCERATION AND HEMORRHAGE

SESSION TITLE: Critical Care Infections SESSION TYPE: Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 09:15 am - 10:15 am INTRODUCTION: Francisella tularensis is a zoonotic disease by an aerobic, gram negative coccobacillus. It is transmitted by exposure to infected animal or vectors in individuals who landscape or camp. Common symptoms are fever, chills, anorexia, and headache. Abdominal tularemia can present with abdominal pain, emesis, diarrhea, and rarely intestinal ulceration and hemorrhage. It is treated with aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones and tetracycline. CASE PRESENTATION: 38-year-old male presented with fever, cough, anorexia, and black stool for 5 days. Patient worked as a landscaper. He has no pets, travel history or sick contacts. He does not take any medications at home. Physical exam was significant for sinus tachycardia and rhonchi of right upper lobe. Significant labs include WBC of 9.8 with 41% bands, hemoglobin 15.5, sodium 125, procalcitonin 27.3, and lactic acid 1.8. COVID-19, MRSA, Legionella and Pneumococcal urine antigen were negative. CTA chest revealed mass-like opacity in right upper lobe with multiple bilateral pulmonary nodules. Lower respiratory culture showed Candida albicans. Patient was empirically started on ceftriaxone and azithromycin. He was transferred to intensive care for worsening respiratory status and was placed on non-invasive ventilation on hospital day 1. Antibiotics were broadened to ceftaroline and levofloxacin due to suspicion of tularemia. Amphotericin B was added. Labs for Histoplasma, Blastomyces, TB, Leptospira, and HIV were negative. Patient then suffered a cardiac arrest on hospital day 2 after having large brown secretions pouring from his mouth. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated and patient was intubated and started on vasopressors with return of spontaneous circulation. Massive blood transfusion protocol was initiated. Emergent bedside upper endoscopy showed large blood clot adherent to duodenal ulcer. Interventional radiology planned on performing gastric duodenal artery embolization. However, patient suffered two more cardiac arrest with resuscitation efforts terminated per family request. Karius Digital Culture later was positive for Francisella tularensis. Autopsy revealed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, hilar lymphadenopathy, and perforated duodenal ulceration with large adherent clot. DISCUSSION: Gastrointestinal tularemia is rare and usually from drinking contaminated water or oral inoculation of bacteria. Intestinal tract involvement can present with mesenteric lymphadenopathy and ulcerative lesions resulting in gastrointestinal bleeding with case fatality rate of 50%. Even though this is noted in the literature, to our knowledge no case reports have been published. CONCLUSIONS: Careful history taking and early identification of risk factors are important when severe tularemia infection is suspected such as in individuals with extensive outdoor activities. Treatment should be empirically initiated in high risk patients. Reference #1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585636/ Reference #2: https://casereports.bmj.com/content/2017/bcr-2017-22125. Reference #3: Altman GB, Wachs JE. Tularemia: A pathogen in nature and a biological weapon. Aaohn Journal. 2002 Aug;50(8):373-9. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Maria Haider Baig

Lightning strikes thrice

Introduction: A case of multiple co-existing conditions during pregnancy in a previously fit and well individual. Case Report: A 24-year-old woman presented at 37 weeks during her second pregnancy with a five day history of vomiting and abdominal pain. She had no significant past medical history. Her oxygen saturations were low so she received treatment for aspiration pneumonia. Her initial COVID-19 antigen test was negative however subsequent PCR was positive. The cause of her acute abdomen was unclear, with the differentials being perforated duodenal ulcer, pancreatitis and appendicitis. With input from general surgery, obstetrics and anaesthesia a decision was made to proceed with a diagnostic laparotomy. Classical caesarean section was performed at the beginning of the procedure. A healthy baby was delivered and laparotomy revealed pancreatitis. Due to high intraoperative oxygen requirements, shewas kept intubated and transferred to intensive care post operatively. An echocardiogram revealed biventricular failure and she was commenced on treatment for peripartum cardiomyopathy. Overall, she remained intubated for nine days andwas discharged from hospital 16 days following her surgery. Followup echocardiogram four months after hospital discharge showed her left ventricular ejection fraction remained <35%. Discussion: COVID-19 is increasingly common these days so it is likely to co-exist with other conditions. The incidence of acute pancreatitis during pregnancy is approximately one in 3000 and the incidence of peripartum cardiomyopathy is also approximately one in 3000 in the western world [1,2]. This case serves as a reminder that multiple conditions may be present in one individual and highlights the importance of completing a full set of investigations. This patient had multiple reasons for respiratory failure, however, an echocardiogram was necessary to reveal peripartum cardiomyopathy. Her ejection fraction remains low which puts her at high risk of mortality for future pregnancies. However, this diagnosis has allowed her to receive the appropriate follow up and counselling.

LOCAL AND SYSTEMIC ADVERSE REACTIONS FOLLOWING COVID-19 VACCINE

The mass vaccination against novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) requires to dynamically evaluate risks of adverse events following immunization to prevent them and develop vaccination tactics for various population groups. We describe a clinical case of reaction following administration of the second dose of the heterologous recombinant adenovirus based COVID-19 vaccine Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) in 48-year-old female healthcare worker. No adverse events after administration of the first dose were recorded. After vaccination, the patient complained of weakness, malaise, headache, loss of appetite, and nausea that lasted for a single day. Reaction at the injection site appeared 10 hours after vaccination manifested as pruritic erythema, induration area up to 1.5 cm size, sharp pain, which resolved within 24 hours. On the second day post-vaccination, an inflammation area up to 1.5 cm size within the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) scar site was noted and manifested as erythema, induration, painful to palpate, pruritus located 2 cm away from the injection site. BCG scar reaction with dull pain and severe pruritus lasted for three weeks. Erythema and induration at the BCG scar site resolved two months after the onset, which were resolved by using antihistaminic agent. The patient was vaccinated according to the Russian Federation Immunization Program, not associated with any adverse events following immunization. The patient had comorbidities such as vasomotor rhinitis, urolithiasis, stomach, duodenal ulcer, type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, and her body mass index of 35.2. The patient permanently receives antihypertensive and antihyperglycemic drugs, and has allergic reaction in the form of urticaria to Berodual. The patient has menopause during two years, but a five-day postmenopausal bleeding three days after vaccination with the second dose was noted. Thus, a high-quality surveillance of any local and systemic reactions associated with vaccination is needed to reveal adverse events to the vaccines against COVID-19 and elaborate a safe immunization program for preventing COVID-19.

Phase Ib study of BI 836880 (VEGF/Ang2 inhibitor) plus ezabenlimab (BI 754091;anti-PD-1 antibody) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Background: Combination of anti-VEGF compounds and immune checkpoint inhibitors is an approved therapy across multiple solid tumors, including advanced HCC. This phase Ib study (NCT03468426) is assessing BI 836880 (bispecific VEGF/Ang2 nanobody) + ezabenlimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in pts with advanced solid tumors. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BI 836880 720 mg + ezabenlimab 240 mg given IV every 3 weeks was determined in Part 1. In Part 2, RP2D was assessed in 7 expansion cohorts. We report data from cohorts in HCC after prior sorafenib/lenvatinib (cohort F) and untreated unresectable HCC (cohort G). Methods: Pts with locally advanced or metastatic HCC, Child-Pugh class A, not eligible for surgical or locoregional therapies were enrolled. Cohort F enrolled pts who had progressed on or after first-line treatment with sorafenib or lenvatinib or who had discontinued due to poor tolerability after ≥2 weeks of treatment. Cohort G enrolled pts who had received no prior systemic therapy for HCC. Treatment continued until disease progression, undue toxicity or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Results: As of Aug 2021, 30/31 pts have been treated in cohorts F/G: 87/77% male;median age 65/64 yrs. Follow-up is ongoing in both cohorts. 9/19 pts in cohorts F/G remain on treatment;median (range) duration of treatment is 175 (42-532)/ 169 (42-336) days in cohorts F/G. All pts were evaluable for response in cohort F: confirmed ORR to date is 40% (1 complete response;11 partial responses [PRs]). Of 28 evaluable pts in cohort G, confirmed ORR to date is 21% (6 PRs). 12 (40%) pts in cohort F and 18 (64%) in cohort G have stable disease. In cohort F, AEs were reported in 28 (93%) pts, most frequently hypertension and proteinuria (each 30%). In cohort G, AEs occurred in 26 (84%) pts, most frequently ascites (26%) and thrombocytopenia (19%). 24 (80%) pts in cohort F and 15 (48%) in cohort G had treatmentrelated AEs (TRAEs). Most frequent TRAEs were proteinuria (27%), infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and hypertension (each 20%) in cohort F, and hypertension (13%), IRRs, hypothyroidism and diarrhea (each 10%) in cohort G. There were 3 pts with G5 AEs in cohort F (COVID-19 pneumonia [n = 1];low Glasgow coma score and dyspnea [n = 1];hepatic cirrhosis [n = 1]) and 1 G5 AE in cohort G (hepatic failure);none were considered related to treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 2 pts in cohort F (G3 hepatic encephalopathy and G2 duodenal ulcer) and 3 in cohort G (G5 hepatic failure [n = 1];G2 acute kidney injury and G1 decreased appetite [n = 1];G2 diarrhea [n = 1]). Conclusions: BI 836880 + ezabenlimab had a manageable safety profile and showed promising activity in pts with untreated and second-line post-sorafenib/lenvatinib advanced HCC. Data continue to mature, particularly in cohort G. Cohort F has been expanded by a further 30 pts.

Proactive anti-inflammatory therapy with levilimab for patients with COVID-19

Objective. To analyze the efficacy of levilimab in patients with COVID-19 to optimize proactive anti-inflammatory therapy. Patients and methods. This single-center retrospective observational controlled study included 75 COVID-19 patients with a mean age of 58.6 years who received intravenous (71%) or subcutaneous (29%) levilimab at a dose of 324 mg on day 9 of the disease [range: 7.0–12.0 days]. Ten patients (14%) additionally received tocilizumab, whereas 14 participants (19%) received only levilimab without dexamethasone. The control group (received no levilimab) included 29 matched patients. The levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, fibrinogen, creatine phosphokinase (CPK), D-dimer, as well as lymphocyte and white blood cell (WBC) counts were measured daily. The percentage of lung damage was assessed using computed tomography (CT) at baseline and later in dynamics. The primary endpoint was patient's transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica v. 12 software (StatSoft, USA);the risk of transfer to ICU was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier cumulative proportional risk method and Cox proportional hazards model by calculating relative risks with a 95% confidence interval (RR [CI]). The dynamics of patients' status and its association with the route of levilimab administration was evaluated using a seven-point scale (seven-category scale) approved by the World Health Organization. Results. No lethal outcomes were registered in this study. Levilimab reduced the risk of transfer to the ICU;significant covariates included obesity (RR = 11.09 [1.29–95.72]) and percentage of lung damage on CT scans (RR = 1.06 [1.01–1.13]). The target group for levilimab therapy should include patients with moderate COVID-19 before day 10 of the disease, who have not yet received corticosteroids (CSs), with a maximum body temperature of ≤38.5°C, lung damage <40% on CT at the time of therapy initiation, and CPK <300 U/L. Levilimab therapy is more beneficial for patients with diabetes mellitus, obesity, severe arterial hypertension, and stomach and duodenal ulcers. Intravenous administration of levilimab at a dose of 324 mg is optimal for a reliable prevention of excessive cytokine release. Levilimab demonstrated equivalent positive effects both together with CSs, and when used alone. Levilimab without CSs alleviated hyperglycemia and normalized WBC count. The following laboratory parameters were found to be most important for the decision on levilimab initiation and further control of treatment efficacy: absolute lymphocyte count, CRP, fibrinogen, and CPK. Levels of lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, platelets, D-dimer did not provide any reliable information on the mitigation of systemic inflammation.